|
The Bourn disaster: why the Phillies must not sign Michael Bourn
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rollins vs. Bourn age 26-29 |
||||||||
| AVG | OBP | SLG | SB | HR | SO | BB | PA | |
| Jimmy Rollins | .285 | .341 | .472 | 165 | 78 | 291 | 211 | 2,893 |
| Michael Bourn | .283 | .347 | .382 | 203 | 15 | 498 | 216 | 2,513 |
His average, OBP, and walks are almost exactly the same, but Jimmy hit 63 more home runs and struck out 207 less times. Bourn is Jimmy Rollins with drastically less homers and immensely more strike outs.
If the recent trades and salary dumping in 2012 means anything, the Phillies simply cannot pay $15 million a year for the next several years on a player with no power, a high strikeout rate, and a low on-base percentage. That is especially the case for a player entering his thirties in a career predicated on speed. The Phillies have enough expensive 30 something players. They don't need another one.
Michael Bourn five years ago was a terrific addition for the price. But Michael Bourn in 2013 and beyond would be a disastrous financial decision for the Phillies.
I'll leave you with the following description a scout provided to Bob Brookover. "He strikes out a lot and doesn't have a great on-base percentage," the scout said. "He's going to be 30 years old, and guys his age do not get faster. I'd be careful."
| search engine by freefind | advanced |